Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Padma Rao v. Anita Rao, et al.
Paid petition · Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, No. 1-21-0316, 1-21-0465 · judgment March 31, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Whether it was a violation of due process to retroactively impose a new fee-shifting penalty in contravention of the established American Rule, where Petitioner had no prior notice that she could be forced to pay another party’s fees simply “in equity” for the first time in the history of Illinois law for conducting litigation in full compliance with pleading requirements and that was never sanctioned, and where no fraud occurred.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Michael Anthony Steigmann
Law Office of Michael Steigmann
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 27 2023Petition DENIED.
- Mar 08 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
- Dec 27 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 17, 2023)