Zafar Iqbal v. Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs, State Board of Medicine

Did the ruling(s), by disregarding testimony of material witness, proven to lie under oath violated petitioner’s right to due process enshrined in fourteenth amendment.

Did the ruling(s) disregard a material witness’s testimony proving fabricated evidence, violated petitioner’s right of due process, equal protection under the law, by fourteenth amendment rights.

Did the ruling(s), disregard violation of fifth amendment’s rights of the petitioner, and due process when a detective as a material witness; admitted under oath to obtain a coerced confession and destroyed an earlier voluntary statement.

Did BPOA, not err but acted with malice and impunity, to flagrantly violate petitioner’s fifth, fourteenth amendments and Due process of the law. 5.

Did the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court ignore flagrant violations by BPOA by Affirmation of BPOA order.

Did, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania by its order, ignored violations of fifth, fourteenth and due process of law guaranteed under the Constitution of the United States. (i)