Warren Adam Taylor v. Augusta-Richmond County Consolidated Commissioners, et al.

Does Congress give this Court the authority under 28 U.S.C. 1292(e) to review the Fourteenth Amendment mandates under the case or controversy jurisdiction which “contains three elements” showing the plaintiff/appellant has suffered: (a) an injury in fact; (b) a causal connection between the injury; and the defendants’ conduct complained of in the district court nugatory [restricted-incorrect docket entry] 12/16/2014?

Can this Court review a state’s solicitor general’s 1 day late filing of warrant and arrest is all but the plainly incompetent or one who is kwowing violating federal law that establish a constitutional violation and that the constitutional violation “clearly established,” is the denial to qualified immunity at the motion to dismiss stage? -*