Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Joseph Michael Ladeairous v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 21-5119 · judgment August 5, 2022
Dismissed · January 9, 2023
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Joseph Michael Ladeairous
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Mar 20 2023Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
- Mar 01 2023Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
- Jan 30 2023Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
- Jan 09 2023The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
- Dec 08 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
- Dec 02 2022Waiver of right of respondent Garland, Merrick, et al. to respond filed.
- Oct 24 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2022)