Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

A. B. v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 21-9584 · judgment August 30, 2022


GVR'd · May 30, 2023
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Charles Roth
National Immigrant Justice Center

For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 3 conferences

Linked docket
22A454

Proceedings

  1. Jul 03 2023
    Judgment issued.
  2. May 30 2023
    Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, 598 U. S. ___ (2023).
  3. May 22 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
  4. May 15 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
  5. Apr 12 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
  6. Mar 29 2023
    Memorandum of respondent Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General filed.
  7. Feb 24 2023
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 29, 2023.
  8. Feb 22 2023
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 27, 2023 to March 29, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
  9. Jan 18 2023
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 27, 2023.
  10. Jan 17 2023
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 26, 2023 to February 27, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
  11. Dec 23 2022
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 26, 2023)
  12. Nov 22 2022
    Application (22A454) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until December 28, 2022.
  13. Nov 18 2022
    Application (22A454) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 28, 2022 to January 27, 2023, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
  14. Nov 18 2022
    Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.