Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Richard Y. Kim v. Hawaii Office of Elections, et al.
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Hawaii, No. SCEC-22-0000508 · judgment August 29, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
1 QUESTION If this honorable US Supreme Court determines Elections Office of Hawaii (EOH) failed to follow State Rules and Regulations and due process, e.g. failure of or no certification on voting machine test, and Supreme Court of Hawaii (SCH) abused its discretion in this case, should States like Hawaii, who has own rules and regulations in such election process, now adopt or be required to have Federal Rules and Regulations, instead?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Richard Y. Kim
For respondent
Kimberly Tsumoto Guidry
Department of the Attorney General, State of HI
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 21 2023Petition DENIED.
- Jan 18 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
- Jan 12 2023Waiver of right of respondent Hawaii Office of Elections, et al. to respond filed.
- Oct 17 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 19, 2023)