Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Lin Ouyang v. Mark A. Borenstein, Judge, Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 21-55647 · judgment March 18, 2022
Dismissed · October 31, 2022
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Lin Ouyang
For respondent
—
Proceedings
- Oct 31 2022The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
- Oct 06 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
- Aug 15 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 19, 2022)
- Jun 08 2022Application (21A804) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 15, 2022.
- Jun 01 2022Application (21A804) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 16, 2022 to August 15, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.