Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Eliezer Alberto Jimenez v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 21-5201 · judgment July 8, 2022
Before the decision, about 3.5× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).
Question presented
*Admitted only in Maryland; practicing law in the District of Columbia during the pendency of his application for admission to the D.C. Bar and under the supervision of lawyers in the firm who are members in good standing of the D.C. Bar
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Andrew Timothy Tutt
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 17 2023Petition DENIED.
- Mar 29 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
- Mar 27 2023Reply of petitioner Eliezer Alberto Jimenez filed. (Distributed)
- Mar 13 2023Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
- Feb 03 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 13, 2023.
- Feb 02 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 10, 2023 to March 13, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jan 05 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 10, 2023.
- Jan 04 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 11, 2023 to February 10, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
- Dec 08 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 11, 2023)