Joachim Martillo v. Twitter, Inc., et al.

Whether digital personal literary property, which a Defendant carries in the form of a post, com­ ment, or tweet, is “other property” according to M.G.L. Chapter 159 § 1.

Whether a 2022 social medium platform is a com­ mon law common carrier.

Whether the public has a Constitutional right, a) which guarantees non-discriminatory com­ mon carriage, b) which was long-established at the time the original thirteen colonial states ratified the US Constitution, and c) which is confirmed by US Constitution Amendment DC.

Whether Amendment I gives a 2022 social me­ dium platform, which is unequivocally a message common carrier, a Constitutional right to refuse message common carriage of digital personal liter­ ary property from any member of the public to any member of the public.

Whether “hosting” (bailment) of digital personal literary property in a backend server constitutes speech of a 2022 social medium platform.

Whether it is allowable for a Court to use a logical fallacy in interpretation of a statute.

Whether a 2022 social medium platform is a 1996 Interactive Computer Service (ICS) as an ICS is defined in 47 U.S. Code § 230. ’; •