Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Pedro Pierluisi, Governor of Puerto Rico, et al. v. Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, No. 21-1071 · judgment June 22, 2022
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a First Circuit decision below, a state or local-government petitioner, and counsel who has filed here before, and down for a business respondent.
Question presented
The Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”) establishes two anti-democratic limitations on the power of Puerto Rico’s Governor and Legislature to enact or enforce new statutes. First, PROMESA Section 108(a) prohibits enacting or enforcing any law “that would impair or defeat the purposes of” PROMESA, “as determined by” the federally-appointed Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico (“Board”). 48 U.S.C. § 2128(a)(2). Second, PROMESA Section 204(a) allows the Board to seek to nullify legislation that is “significantly inconsistent with” the Board’s certified fiscal plan, id. § 2144(a), a blueprint for the Commonwealth’s fiscal goals. As part of this process, Section 204(a) requires the Governor to submit to the Board a “formal estimate ... of the impact, if any, that the law will have on expenditures and revenues.” Id. § 2144(a)(2)(A). If the Governor fails to submit such an estimate as well as a certification that the new law is not significantly inconsistent with the fiscal plan, Section 204(a) allows the Board to “seek judicial enforcement of its authority” to “ensure that the enactment or enforcement of the law will not adversely affect the territorial government’s compliance with the Fiscal Plan, including preventing the enforcement or application of the law.” Id. §§ 2124(k); 2144(a)(5). The questions presented are: 1. What standard of review governs a district court’s evaluation of the Board’s determination that Puerto Rican legislation “would impair or defeat the purposes of” PROMESA, id. § 2128(a)(2), and its review of that legislation for consistency with the fiscal
Counsel of record
For petitioner
William J. Sushon
O'Melveny & Myers LLP
For respondent
Martin J. Bienenstock
Proskauer Rose LLP
Proceedings
- Mar 27 2023Motion for leave to file amicus brief out of time filed by Hon. Jose Luis Dalmau DENIED.
- Mar 27 2023Petition DENIED.
- Mar 08 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
- Mar 07 2023Reply of petitioner Honorable Pedro Pierluisi, et al. filed. (Distributed)
- Feb 21 2023Brief of respondent Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico in opposition filed.
- Feb 16 2023Motion for leave to file out of time amicus brief filed of Hon. Jose Luis Dalmau.
- Dec 05 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 21, 2023. See Rule 30.1.
- Dec 02 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 22, 2022 to February 20, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
- Nov 18 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 22, 2022)
- Sep 13 2022Application (22A223) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until November 19, 2022.
- Sep 09 2022Application (22A223) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 20, 2022 to November 19, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.