Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Lezlie J. Gunn v. Hans-Peter Wild
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 22-5015 · judgment September 13, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Should the requirement that a plaintiffs cause of action arise from or relate to the defendant’s minimum contacts with a state apply to foreign national defend ants who have extensive contacts within the state?
-
Did the Sixth Circuit fail to abide by the United States Supreme Court’s newest ruling regarding per sonal jurisdiction (Ford Motor Co. v. Mont. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 141 S.Ct. 1017 (2021)) by basing its ruling solely on the grounds my claim did not “arise from” Wild’s business transactions, and by failing to even consider whether my claim is “related to” Wild’s business transactions?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Lezlie J. Gunn
For respondent
Aaron R Maurice
Maurice Wood
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 23 2023Petition DENIED.
- Jan 04 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/20/2023.
- Jan 03 2023Reply of petitioner Lezlie J. Gunn filed. (Distributed)
- Dec 16 2022Brief of respondent Hans-Peter Wild in opposition filed.
- Nov 14 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 19, 2022)