Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Pennsylvania v. Akim Sharif Jones-Williams
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District, No. 27 MAP 2021 · judgment July 20, 2022
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a petition filed soon after the judgment below.
Question presented
Did the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issue a decision in conflict with, and fail to properly apply and follow, binding legal precedent from the United States Supreme Court in Mitchell v. Wisconsin, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 2525 (2019) and in conflict with Mitchell’s application in other jurisdictions by finding that exigent circumstances did not exist to support a warrantless request by police of hospital personnel to test Defendant/motorist’s blood drawn from him while unconscious or stuporous and after Defendant drove and caused his vehicle to collide with a Train, which killed his paramour and seriously injured his infant daughter, and where there was probable cause to believe that Defendant did so while and due to being under the influence of marijuana?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
—
For respondent
Shawn Michael Dorward
The Dorward Law Firm, LLC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Dec 12 2022Petition DENIED.
- Nov 22 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/9/2022.
- Nov 19 2022Waiver of right of respondent Akim S. Jones-Williams to respond filed.
- Oct 18 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 21, 2022)