Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Karim Christian Kamal v. Joseph A. Farrow, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 20-55065 · judgment September 23, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
The Ninth Circuit is in disagreement with the Second and Eight Circuits: D6 attorney's fees and. court costs incurred as a result of fraud.constitute RICO economic damages?
-
Did County of Los Angeles (“County”) and individual defendants associated with County discriminate against Appellant on the basis of his national origin as alleged in the Second Amended Complaint? LIST OF PARTIES The Petitioner is: Karim C. Kamal. The Respondents are: SACRAMENTO California Highway Patrol: Joseph Farrow, I.J Tillman, Jose Haro, Lisa Ann Fossi, Gurwinder Rakkar. ALTADENA California Highway Patrol Station: Dustin Sherman, Rebecca Lynch, Robert Garcia. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES: Gail Farber, Arnel Dulay, Craig Cline, Rosemarie Brazal. COUNTY’S ATTORNEYS: HurrelLCantrall LLP, Thomas Hurrell, Melinda Cantrali, Warren Williams.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Karim Christian Kamal
For respondent
—
Proceedings
- Oct 03 2022Petition DENIED.
- Aug 24 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
- May 04 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 11, 2022)
- Mar 21 2022Application (21A524) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 27, 2022.
- Mar 17 2022Application (21A524) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 28, 2022 to May 27, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.