Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Everton Daye v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 20-14340 · judgment July 6, 2022

Certiorari denied · January 9, 2023
Pre-decision estimate: 5% cert probability (95% interval 3%–8%)

Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, an Eleventh Circuit decision below, and a petition filed soon after the judgment below.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Paul Whitfield Hughes
McDermott Will & Emery

For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage

Linked docket
22A228

Proceedings

  1. Jan 09 2023
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Dec 21 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
  3. Dec 20 2022
    Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.
  4. Dec 20 2022
    Reply of petitioner Everton Daye filed. (Distributed)
  5. Dec 16 2022
    Brief of respondent Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General in opposition filed.
  6. Nov 15 2022
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 16, 2022.
  7. Nov 14 2022
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 16, 2022 to December 16, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
  8. Nov 14 2022
    Brief amici curiae of Former Executive Office of Immigration Review Judges filed.
  9. Oct 10 2022
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 16, 2022)
  10. Sep 15 2022
    Application (22A228) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until November 3, 2022.
  11. Sep 13 2022
    Application (22A228) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 4, 2022 to November 3, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.
  12. Sep 13 2022
    Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case shouild be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.