Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Lu Tuan Nguyen v. David Ribal, et al.
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, No. G060234 · judgment April 20, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Questions presented
-
Whether the sustaining of the respondent’s de murrer is in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amend ment to the United States Constitution in light of the respondents and their attorneys’ deception to the court and the public.
-
Whether the court was bias in ruling that Appel lant is not entitled to anything in the conservatee’s estate and therefore has violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Con stitution.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Lu Tuan Nguyen
For respondent
Cheryl L. Walsh
Law Offices of Cheryl L. Walsh, APC
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, November 21, 2022 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Nov 21 2022Petition DENIED.
- Nov 02 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
- Oct 21 2022Waiver of right of respondents David Ribal, Laura Tiano to respond filed.
- Oct 04 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 7, 2022)