Zia Shaikh v. Madeline F. Einbinder, et al.

CASE BRIEF The Petitioner filed in the United States District Court of New Jersey CIVIL CASE NO.: 3:2020-cv-02540 BRM-DEA against the Defendant Judges for the following Constitutional Violations as follows: (D VIOLATIONS OF 42 USC 1981. 1983.1985.1986 and 1988. against Defendants Einbinder. Ford. Doran. Schron. Hodgson and Thorton (2) Violations of the Fourth. Fourteenth and Eight Amendments to the Constitution of the United States against Defendants Einbinder. Ford. Doran. Schron. Hodgson, and Thorton. The Defendants in this instant case have performed quasi- judicial acts and are subject to personal liability for their actions and Constitutional Violations. The complaint of the Petitioner involves the tortious acts of various state judges’ action as judicial administrators under the color of state law. They have for years been violating the Petitioner’s rights protected by the United States Constitution and Federal law. They have illegally kidnaped the Petitioner and are guilty of abuse of Process and malicious prosecution in this case. The United States District Court dismissed Petitioners Second Amendment Complaint and denied his motion for a preliminary injunction on 1st November 2021. Petitioner Appealed from the order dated 1st November 2021 of the United States District Court of New Jersey in CIVIL CASE NO.: 3:2020-cv-02540 BRMDEA denying appellants civil complaint and motion for preliminary injunction.