Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Christine Chui v. Benjamin Tze-Man Chui, et al.
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, No. B306918 · judgment March 2, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether our government can deprive real properties from parties (including wards in guardianships) on complex matters in chambers without any notice, evidentiary hearing, or due process;
-
Whether our government’s officers, including judges, court appointed guardians ad litem, and lawyers can bind real parties to a settlement, by precluding real parties to participate in four inseverable versions adding or modifying 25 new material terms, in chambers, without any knowledge, consent, or participation from real parties, after the settlement was rejected 5 times by the Court, Respondents, and wards;
Counsel of record
For petitioner
James Glenn Bohm
Bohm Wildish, LLP
For respondent
Alex M. Weingarten
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
Proceedings
- Jan 09 2023Petition DENIED.
- Jan 04 2023Supplemental brief of petitioner Christine Chui filed. (Distributed)
- Jan 03 2023Supplemental brief of respondent Benjamin Chui filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
- Dec 22 2022Supplemental brief of petitioner Christine Chui filed. (Distributed)
- Nov 30 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
- Nov 29 2022Reply of petitioner Christine Chui filed. (Distributed)
- Nov 16 2022Brief of respondents Benjamin Chui and Margaret Lee in opposition filed. VIDED.
- Oct 11 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 18, 2022, for all respondents.
- Oct 07 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 19, 2022 to November 18, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
- Sep 12 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 19, 2022)