Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Ukraine v. PAO Tatneft
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 20-07091 · judgment December 28, 2021
Before the decision, about 2.9× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a D.C. Circuit decision below, counsel with five or more prior petitions here, and a circuit split argued in the petition.
Question presented
Whether the doctrine of forum non conveniens is available in proceedings to confirm a foreign arbitral award in the United States. (I)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John Patrick Elwood
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
For respondent
Hyland Hunt
Deutsch Hunt PLLC
Case
Subject area
Judicial Power (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Linked docket
21A528
Proceedings
- Oct 03 2022Petition DENIED. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- Sep 07 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
- Sep 06 2022Reply of petitioner Ukraine filed. (Distributed)
- Aug 23 2022Brief of respondent PAO Tatneft in opposition filed.
- Jul 12 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 23, 2022.
- Jul 11 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 5, 2022 to August 23, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jul 01 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 5, 2022)
- Mar 23 2022Application (21A528) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until July 3, 2022.
- Mar 18 2022Application (21A528) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 4, 2022 to July 3, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.