Steven Pascale v. RPI Company

Question i Presented Brayton Law was barred from practicing due to lying, breach of lawyers oath of office, impropriety, and dishonesty: See Appendix K, p. 27 (CV 442750 Judge Harry Hanna, January 18, 2007 / Cuyahoga, Ohio. “If there had been any complicity by any member of the Kananian family, such a Draconian measure migh be appropriate! however, the family did nothing improper. Therefore, the motion to dismiss is overruled.” Given the precedence and anteposition of C484162 i.e. (1984-1997) being reinstated (2006) in an “off the record” manner (becoming FCS 10 345910) for the benefit of fraud, embezzlement, money laundering, and malice wherein every trial was illicitly masked from plaintiffs (settlements misappropriated across 50,000 said defendants). See Exhibit Preface p. 29. does the Kananian opinion seem appropriate for FCS 10 345910 and WD BC500626 ? 12 3 1.) PI (pleural - lungs - asbestosis) 1984 -1997. Rose Klein & Marias - Every trial concealed and every defendant settlement stolen C484162. 2.) PI (pleural - lungs - asbestosis) C484162 case re-instated for violations to constitutional rights, malice and oppression. Long-Cause and believed to be open + being prosecuted. Every trial concealed - settlements stolen. FCS 10 345910 3.) PI (colon) filed in TX 329014 (Quilling Selandar illegally retained) 2005 * ? Every trial concealed and every defendant settlement stolen. Unlawful * Date of Death deceit