Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Randy Ralston, et al. v. San Mateo County, California, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 21-16489 · judgment November 1, 2022

Certiorari denied · October 2, 2023
Pre-decision estimate: 8% cert probability (95% interval 5%–12%)

Before the decision, about 2× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a Ninth Circuit decision below, and counsel who has filed here before.

Question presented

PETER PROWS Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP 235 Montgomery St. Ste. 935 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 402-2700 pprows@briscoelaw.net Counsel for Petitioners

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Robert H. Thomas
Pacific Legal Foundation

For respondent
Timothy James Fox
San Mateo County, Office of the County Attorney

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Linked docket
22A865

Order
Order list, October 2, 2023 · Certiorari denied

Proceedings

  1. Oct 02 2023
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jul 12 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
  3. Jul 10 2023
    Waiver of right of respondent County of San Mateo to respond filed.
    Main Document
  4. Jul 05 2023
    Waiver of right of respondent California Coastal Commission to respond filed.
    Main Document
  5. Jun 16 2023
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 21, 2023)
    PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
  6. Apr 03 2023
    Application (22A865) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until June 19, 2023.
  7. Mar 28 2023
    Application (22A865) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 20, 2023 to June 19, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.
    Main DocumentOtherOtherLower Court Orders/Opinions