Gwendolyn D. Gabriel, et al. v. Merry Outlaw, et al.

After a Defendant/Respondent committed Fraud and Obstruction of Justice by Perjury, the other Respondents/Association-In-Fact (comprised of both Defendant’s Attorneys, Plaintiffs’ Attorneys and a Judge) conspired to commit a pattern of additional, interrelated predicate acts, i.e., Obstruction of Justice, Attempted Bribery/Witness Tampering, and a Threat, to continue to cover up the Defendant’s predicate acts, from 2010 through 2021. The Respondents’ predicate acts and/or conduct committed were interrelated and formed a pattern of racketeering activity and were the proximate cause of Plaintiffs’/Petitioners’ injuries to property and income, which included their foreclosure, eviction of a Petitioner and her minor children and filing a 3rd lawsuit with more Fraud and Obstruction of Justice, and placed Lis Pendens on 3 additional Petitioners’ properties, including a Petitioners’ homestead - that are still present to date - in order to collect on this unlawfully-obtained debt. The questions presented and constitutional issues are as follows-

1. Whether the RICO statute, 18 U.S.C. § Section 1962(c), provides Attorneys Qualified Immunity from RICO lawsuits when compelling evidence exists that they have committed predicate acts/crimes and/or furthered the common goal of the AssociationIn-Fact, which directly injured Petitioners’ property and income.

2. Whether attempted acts of Bribery/Witness Tampering alone, because they were