Harold Jean-Baptiste v. Department of Justice, et al.

Whether inexcusable error or neglect by U.S. Court of Appeals for the District Court of Columbia to issue an improper Order stating the Court had no ju­ risdiction when the U.S. Court of Appeals has complete jurisdiction. The Order by U.S. Court of Appeals for the District Court of Columbia is inexcusable judicial er­ ror. The inexcusable judicial error of U.S. Court of Ap­ peals for the District Court of Columbia is a judicial mistake because the case has complete jurisdiction for appeal under 28 U.S. Code § 1291, 28 U.S. Code § 1292 and 28 U.S. Code § 1295. The U.S. Court of Appeals made an error and also applied the law incorrectly by ignoring the fact the U.S. District Court dismissed the case without merit base on judicial bias and inexcusa­ ble neglect to not even heed to opposition review and direct violation of Local Civil Rules 7(b). The U.S. Court ofAppeals should have issued an order of default judgment since the respondents failed to respond in 21 days after the application for enforcement was filed and no notice of appearance according to Cir. Rules U.S. Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit rule 12 and 15(b)(2) The U.S. Court of Appeals accepted the error of the U.S. District Court for the District Court of Columbia when it should have overturned the U.S. Dis­ trict Court error in judgment. The U.S. Court of Ap­ peals denied petitioner’s right to petition and due process because the case has jurisdiction for appeal, the inexcusable neglect of the U.S. Court of Appeals diminishing the guiding foundation for the Judicial . j