Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Xiulu Ruan and John Patrick Couch v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 17-12653 · judgment January 5, 2023
Before the decision, about 4× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).
Question presented
In Ruan v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 2370 (2022) (App., infra, 19a-54a), this Court held that a physician may be convicted under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) of the Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”) only if the government proves that the defendant “knew or intended that his or her conduct was unauthorized.” Id. at 2382 (App., infra, 37a) (emphasis added). The Court remanded Petitioners’ case to the Eleventh Circuit, and Dr. Shakeel Kahn’s companion case to the Tenth Circuit, so that those courts could consider whether the jury instructions comported with the “except as authorized” requirement of the statute. The question presented, on which the circuits are divided, is whether, in a CSA jury instruction, 21 C.F.R. § 1306.04(a) may replace the statute’s “except as authorized” requirement, thereby permitting the jury to convict a physician simply because she knew that her prescription would fall outside the “usual” course of medical practice or would be regarded as “illegitimate” by most other doctors, and thus empowering a federal agency to create a felony offense that Congress itself did not enact. (i)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Lawrence Saul Robbins
Friedman Kaplan Seiler Adelman & Robbins LLP
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Amicus briefs
2 cert-stage
Proceedings
- Nov 06 2023Petition DENIED.
- Oct 18 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2023.
- Oct 13 2023Reply of petitioners Xiulu Ruan, et al. filed.
- Sep 29 2023Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
- Aug 28 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 29, 2023.
- Aug 24 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 1, 2023 to September 29, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jul 27 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 1, 2023.
- Jul 26 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 4, 2023 to September 1, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jul 05 2023Amicus brief of Physicians Against Abuse not accepted for filing. (July 14, 2023 - corrected copy to be filed)
- Jul 05 2023Brief amicus curiae of Physicians Against Abuse filed (Docketed July 25, 2023).
- Jul 03 2023Brief amici curiae of Association of American Physicians, et al. filed.
- Jun 23 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 4, 2023.
- Jun 22 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 5, 2023 to August 4, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
- May 31 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 5, 2023)