Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Faraz Fadavi Akhavan Bonab v. Samuel Ginn

Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, No. H048837 · judgment October 25, 2022


Certiorari denied · October 2, 2023
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a state court may exercise specific jurisdiction when the plaintiff’s claims arise out of or relate to the defendant’s purposeful contacts with the forum state. The Question Presented is: Whether this requirement is met when the defendant forms a business relationship with the plaintiff in the forum state, where both reside, the parties travel pursuant to that relationship to another state, where the defendant causes injury to the plaintiff, and both subsequently return to the forum state.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
John C. Stein
The Boccardo Law Firm, Inc.

For respondent
Steven S. Fleischman
Horvitz & Levy LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 02 2023
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jun 21 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
  3. Jun 15 2023
    Waiver of right of respondent Samuel Ginn to respond filed.
  4. May 16 2023
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 20, 2023)