Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Faraz Fadavi Akhavan Bonab v. Samuel Ginn
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, No. H048837 · judgment October 25, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a state court may exercise specific jurisdiction when the plaintiff’s claims arise out of or relate to the defendant’s purposeful contacts with the forum state. The Question Presented is: Whether this requirement is met when the defendant forms a business relationship with the plaintiff in the forum state, where both reside, the parties travel pursuant to that relationship to another state, where the defendant causes injury to the plaintiff, and both subsequently return to the forum state.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John C. Stein
The Boccardo Law Firm, Inc.
For respondent
Steven S. Fleischman
Horvitz & Levy LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 02 2023Petition DENIED.
- Jun 21 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
- Jun 15 2023Waiver of right of respondent Samuel Ginn to respond filed.
- May 16 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 20, 2023)