Palani Karupaiyan v. Township of Woodbridge, New Jersey, et al.

Petitioner’s prayed reliefs were i) National importance of having the US Supreme Court decide or conflict with USSC ruling, or importance of similarly situated over millions of citizens or the first impression is raised at USSC. ii) Petitioners’ property rights under 42 U.S.C § 1982 and Hindu Successive Act were denied when USSC ruled in Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park. Inc.. 396 US 229 - Supreme Court 1969 @237 “Section 1982 [42 U.S.C § 1982/ covers the right "to inherit, purchase, lease, sell. hold, and convey real and personal property." iii) Local Govts/Foreign Govt violating, Parents rights (14th amendment) which were ruled by USSC under Troxel v. Granville. 530 U.S. 57 (2000) and Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U. S. 702, 720. iv) Local Govts illegally taken away Petitioners property without Jury trial. v) Local Govts illegally issued arrest warrant without Jury trial. Petitioner’s prayed over 10 reliefs were as Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition or alternative so the questions , were part of three test condition requirement of the Writs.