Lori A. Saxon v. Ameritas Life Insurance Corporation

Were Lori Saxon’s fundamental guaran­ teed rights to Due Process and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1st, 4th, 5th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 14th amendments violated?

Can The Lower Courts claim Res Judi­ cata when judgments entered against pe­ titioner were obtained by fraud on the court? Did the court violate Lori Saxon’s legal and constitutional rights by allow­ ing false orders and claims of res judicata cited by the lower court?

Were homestead Laws and Bankruptcy Laws in the District of Columbia violated by the lower court’s failure to require re­ spondents and agents to produce in open court under 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. and 15 U.S.C. § 1692(g) specifically, proof of chain of title as petitioner has been de­ nied a jury trial and fair and honest ser­ vices and the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729? Lori Saxon had a chapter 7 Bankruptcy dis­ charged in 2008. Numerous foreclosure mills and debt collectors have tried to foreclose on Lori Saxon’s home since 2010, violating the FDCPA, Homestead Laws in the District of Columbia, and Lori Saxon’s right to Due Process. In 2013, The DC and US Government officials, DC Superior Court Judges, Attorneys, and Court Insid­ ers set up The Judicial Foreclosure Working Group to \ i I < u V '• \