Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Robert R. Snyder v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 21-55087 · judgment January 25, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
• Does Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 12 permit a defendant to file successive, pre-answer Rule 12(b)(6) motion(s) to dismiss—each towards a separate claim—six months apart? * Where as here, if a prisoner is subject to constant intra-facility transfers over a period of 24 months, does this constitute 'an expected parameter of the sentenced imposed by the trial court'? • Is it fundamentally unfair for the District Court to allow Petitioner's well documented claims of custodial abuse to remain in the pleadings stage, for 35 months before eventually dismissing the case? • Considering the nature and volume of the evidence lodged into the record, should the public-official defendants named below, be able to avoid liability for their overt acts/omissions? • After the United States Magistrate Judge declared that Petitioner stated a claim, did the 'burden shift1 within the meaning of Mt. Healthy u. Doyle, for the purposes of § 1983 retaliation claims? Where is the constitutional line drawn between pleading standards and burden of proof?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Robert R. Snyder
For respondent
Neah Huynh
Office of the Attorney General State of California
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 02 2023Petition DENIED.
- Jun 14 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
- May 17 2023Waiver of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al., Gastelo, Ward,, Asuncion, Florecky, Phillips, Scheiffele, Esquerra of right to respond not accepted for filing. (May 18, 2023)
- May 17 2023Waiver of right of respondents California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al., Gastelo, Ward,, Asuncion, Florecky, Phillips, Scheiffele, Esquerra to respond filed.
- Apr 25 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 30, 2023)