Sergei Vinkov v. Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company

Has the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (9th Circuit) correctly determined the jurisdictional power of the federal court over Insurer’s claims and denial of affirmative relief for a pro se party in duty-to-defend proceedings on the directly related pending state action under Article III requirements and U.S. Code: Title 28?

Whether Insurer properly obtained a judgment in the federal court against a pro se volunteer director of a religious federal tax-exempt corporation from pending state proceedings in the light of the U.S. Constitution (Article III, First Amendment, Due Process Laws) and Acts of US Congress, especially under the restrictions of 28 U.S.C. §2072(b); 26 U.S.C. §7428, 28 U.S.C. §1332, and 28 U.S.C. §2283?