Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Whole Woman's Health, et al.
Paid petition
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
LORIE CHAITEN JAMIE A. LEVITT AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES J. ALEXANDER LAWRENCE UNION FOUNDATION MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 1640 North Sedgwick St. 250 W. 55th St. Chicago, IL 60614 New York, NY 10019 DAVID COLE RUPALI SHARMA AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES LAWYERING PROJECT UNION FOUNDATION 113 Bonnybriar Rd. 915 15th St., NW South Portland, ME 04106 Washington, DC 20005 STEPHANIE TOTI ADRIANA PINON LAWYERING PROJECT DAVID DONATTI 41 Schermerhorn St., ANDRE SEGURA No. 1056 ACLU FOUNDATION OF Brooklyn, NY 11201 TEXAS, INC 5225 Katy Fwy., Ste. 350 Houston, TX 77007 Counsel for Petitioners JANUARY 3, 2022
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Marc Andrew Hearron
Center for Reproductive Rights
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
—
Argument & decision
Decided January 20, 2022.
Proceedings
- Jan 20 2022Petition DENIED. Justice Breyer, with whom Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan join, dissenting from denial of mandamus. (Detached Opinion) Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Breyer and Justice Kagan join, dissenting from denial of mandamus. (Detached Opinion)
- Jan 18 2022Letter from counsel for petitioners regarding court of appeals' certification order filed.
- Jan 03 2022Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due February 3, 2022)
- Jan 03 2022Motion to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of mandamus filed by petitioners.