Donald Clinton Crabtree v. Christine Crabtree

I. Did Judge Monet Pincus violate the 1st Amendment protection of freedom of expression and generally condemn religious expression of men? II. Did the South Carolina Trial Court err in facilitating divorce of Washington State residents? III. Did the Judge George McFadden ignore substantial exonerating evidence in support of Husband at the beginning of litigation and fail to render him due process? IV. Did the Court ignore its own psychological reports and expert testimony and wrongly assign credibility to the Wife? V. Did the Court convert issues, conflate mischaracterizations, minimize salient facts and construct findings in order to inappropriately assign credibility to the Wife? VI. Do the findings of Judge Monet Pincus demonstrate mischaracterization, religious persecution, abuse of power in order to exercise prejudice and ignore torts against partnership obligations? VII. Does Judge Monet Pincus bring discredit to the judiciary by manifest gender prejudice and malfeasance? 1. Does Judge Monet Pincus substitute hearsay regarding Husband’s childhood in order to mischaracterize findings regarding pornography?