Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

The Montana State Legislature, et al. v. Beth McLaughlin

Paid petition · Supreme Court of Montana, No. OP 21-0173 · judgment July 14, 2021


Certiorari denied · March 21, 2022
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

When emails surfaced showing numerous Montana judges engaged in unethical and prejudicial behavior, the Montana State Legislature began investigating and ultimately issued subpoenas to the Court Administrator and the Justices of the Montana Supreme Court. The Court Administrator sued in the Montana Supreme Court to quash the subpoenas. After a flurry of procedural irregularities, the Montana Supreme Court quashed the legislative subpoenas—including those issued to themselves. The Legislature moved to disqualify the Justices on due process grounds. The court denied that motion, and then issued a wide-ranging opinion clearing itself of any wrongdoing and eviscerating the Legislature’s investigative powers. The question presented is: Whether the refusal by the Justices of the Montana Supreme Court to recuse from a case in which they harbored direct, substantial, and admittedly disqualifying interests violates this Court’s rule under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment that no man may be a judge in his own cause.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
David Morgan Steven Dewhirst
Office of the Solicitor General

For respondent
Randy J. Cox
Boone Karlberg P.C.

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage

Proceedings

  1. Mar 21 2022
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Mar 02 2022
    Reply of petitioners Montana State Legislature, et al. filed. (Distributed)
  3. Feb 23 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
  4. Feb 09 2022
    Brief of respondent Beth McLaughlin in opposition filed.
  5. Jan 10 2022
    Brief amicus curiae of Governor Greg Gianforte filed.
  6. Dec 17 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 9, 2022.
  7. Dec 16 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 10, 2022 to February 9, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
  8. Dec 06 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 10, 2022)