Philippe Zogbe Zatta v. Steven Charles Eldred, et al.

Whether Petitioner, a Black father, raising his daughter since birth in California and supporting his child in Missouri at all times after separation or divorce according to the preponderance of proofs or evidence, can be prosecuted, have judgments entered against him and his property seized by California and Missouri child support services for “having not provided support to his child since birth”?

Whether judgments entered against Petitioner for “having not provided support to his daughter since birth” in spite of all proofs or evidence presented by Petitioner in court clearly establishing that Petitioner was raising his daughter since birth and supporting her at all times are valid and enforceable judgments against Petitioner?

Whether judgments secured against Petitioner through frauds, child support frauds, frauds upon the court, in the complete absence of all jurisdiction or in violation of due process are valid or enforceable judgments against Petitioner in California or Missouri?

Whether 42 U.S.C. § 651 creates any excep­ tion^) allowing child support services of California to seize Petitioner’s property by enforcing a nonexistent child support order allegedly secured for Petitioner’s son born in 2002 in France now living with Petitioner in California or by enforcing a nonexistent judgment of Alimony against Petitioner?

Whether the States of Missouri and California child support agencies or Superior Court of California can infringe on or interfere with Petitioner’s funda­ mental parental rights in spite of the preponderance of proofs or evidence clearly establishing that Petitioner