Gina Russomanno v. Dan Dugan, et al.

O QUESTIONS FOR REVIEwO

1. Whether the Supreme Court will consider the merits of the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third District, pursuant to res judicata, barring anti-discrimination claims, when such decision contradicts with the petitioners “express allegations,”and directly conflicts with relevant precedent.

2. Whether a simultaneous dismissal for a “remand” reconsideration juxtaposed as a “judgement” reconsideration within a single ‘uniform-decision* with a motion to dismiss can completely foreclose all rights to due process in new-evidence, and serve to later justify the barring of subsequent claim (by res judicata).

3. Whether proper precedent establishes that when new and discrete evidence information arises from a prior case it permits judicial right to proceed and provision for timely leave to reinstate. Whether reasonable amendment would be futile when the court withholds leave to reinstate, quashes all due process, and completely forecloses on new evidence claims.

4. Whether res judicata same-claim preclusion can bar discrimination claims in Title VII, ADEA, and Equal Pay Act and NJLAD and Diane B. Allen Equal Pay Act when the two cases do not duplicate in any discrimination statutes either federal or state by any (reiteration, simultaneous, additional, or ‘same-claim’) overlap and are wholly separate in cause of action.

5. Whether “assumptions” that are “absent any elaboration” (as defined by previous courts) can still support reasoning decision to determine that discrimination “must have been prior known.” Whether precedent governs that the merits of “material facf are adjudicated on “determinative” claim. i.