Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Patrick Huff v. Florida
Paid petition · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, No. 4D19-3750 · judgment March 3, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
In Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court for Norfolk County, 457 U.S. 596 (1982), this Court held that a state’s mandatory courtroom closure rule, triggered by the testimony of a minor victim of certain sex offenses, violated the First Amendment. Two years later, in Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984), this Court held that before closing a courtroom to members of the public, the Sixth Amendment requires a court to (1) consider whether an overriding interest is likely to be prejudiced absent closure; (2) ensure that the closure be no broader than necessary to protect that interest; (3) consider reasonable alternatives to the requested closure; and (4) make specific factual findings relating to these factors. The question presented is: Whether, as the court below and two other states hold, trial courts may close a courtroom pursuant to a closure statute without undertaking the Waller analysis; or, as nine states and the federal courts of appeals hold, the Sixth Amendment and Waller require an assessment of the specific facts of the case and proposed closure, notwithstanding the existence of a statute governing closure. (i)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Devi Maheswari Rao
Roderick & Solange MacArthur Justice Center
For respondent
Henry Charles Whitaker
Florida Office of the Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Amicus briefs
2 cert-stage
Proceedings
- May 02 2022Petition DENIED.
- Apr 13 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
- Apr 12 2022Reply of petitioner Patrick Huff filed. (Distributed)
- Mar 25 2022Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
- Feb 22 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 25, 2022.
- Feb 18 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 25, 2022 to March 25, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jan 12 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 25, 2022.
- Jan 11 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 26, 2022 to February 25, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
- Dec 27 2021Response Requested. (Due January 26, 2022)
- Dec 23 2021Brief amici curiae of Law Professors Justin Murray and Jocelyn Simonson filed.
- Dec 22 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
- Dec 20 2021Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
- Dec 17 2021Brief amicus curiae of Floyd Abrams Institute for Freedom of Expression filed.
- Nov 18 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 23, 2021)