Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Mackie L. Shivers, Jr. v. United States, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 17-12493 · judgment June 9, 2021


Certiorari denied · March 21, 2022
Pre-decision estimate: 5% cert probability

Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and an Eleventh Circuit decision below.

Question presented

The Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. 1346(b)(1), includes a “discretionary function exception,” 28 U.S.C. 2680(a), that immunizes the United States from state tort liability based on its employees’ performance of discretionary functions. The First, Eighth, Ninth, and D.C. Circuits have squarely held that the exception does not apply when federal employees’ conduct violates the Constitution. Below, a divided panel of the Eleventh Circuit joined the Seventh Circuit in going the other way, holding in a reported decision that the exception applies, and thus bars suit against the United States, even when the challenged conduct is unconstitutional. The question presented is: Whether the discretionary function exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act immunizes the United States from tort liability for acts taken by its employees in violation of the Constitution.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Lindsey C Boney IV
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Mar 21 2022
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Feb 23 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
  3. Feb 17 2022
    Reply of petitioner Mackie L. Shivers, Jr. filed.
  4. Feb 09 2022
    Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
  5. Dec 27 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 9, 2022.
  6. Dec 22 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 10, 2022 to February 9, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Dec 03 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 10, 2022.
  8. Dec 02 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 9, 2021 to January 10, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
  9. Nov 05 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 9, 2021)