Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Edmond Lumaj v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 18-3620, 19-2036 · judgment April 12, 2021
Certiorari denied · March 7, 2022
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
David Andrew Isaacson
Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 07 2022Petition DENIED.
- Feb 16 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
- Feb 14 2022Reply of petitioner Edmond Lumaj filed. (Distributed)
- Feb 02 2022Brief of respondent Merrick B.Garland, Attorney General in opposition filed.
- Dec 21 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 2, 2022.
- Dec 20 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 3, 2022 to February 2, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
- Nov 18 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 3, 2022.
- Nov 16 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 2, 2021 to January 3, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
- Oct 29 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 2, 2021)
- Oct 29 2021Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in ths case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.