Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Jason Jarvis v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 20-3912 · judgment June 3, 2021
Before the decision, about 2× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a dissent in the court below, and counsel who has filed here before.
Question presented
Whether non-retroactive changes in federal law can serve as “extraordinary and compelling reasons” warranting a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Michael R. Dreeben
O’Melveny & Myers LLP
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage
Order
Order list, January 10, 2022 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Jan 10 2022Petition DENIED.
- Dec 22 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
- Dec 22 2021Reply of petitioner Jason Jarvis filed. (Distributed)
- Dec 08 2021Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
- Nov 17 2021Brief amici curiae of FAMM and NACDL filed.
- Nov 15 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 8, 2021.
- Nov 12 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 18, 2021 to December 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
- Oct 15 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 18, 2021)