Kenneth A. Pruitt v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al.

As used herein, “Respondent Ultra Vires Actor” (RUVA) means any Respondent, either individual or agency, not acting within authorized scope of official capacity of governmental authority but acting ultra vires, acting either alone or with unknown and unnamed other persons improperly causing violations of U.S. domestic law referenced within 2006 U.S. entry to 2003-31-OCT MERIDA UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION (UNCAC) and/or violate UNCAC. As used herein, Paris Climate Accord (PCA) means “Paris Climate Accord” and is also called “Paris Climate Agreement”, “Paris Agreement”, “Paris Accord”, or “Accord du Paris” in references cited in for Petitioner’s Complaint (ROA 1). Question One: Can Counsel for Respondent U.S. Government defend or assist RUVA for ultra vires acts outside scope of government authority, when RUVA has not filed any denial of corrupt acts alleged by this case? Petitioner’s Complaint (ROA 1) and many other papers complain that RUVA’s own published statements of plans to act, and actions, prove misuse of influence, fraud and bribery and thus are corrupt or violate UNCAC standards. Petitioner placed, on April 12, before the District Court outcome determinative questions of law regarding RUVA and their PCA statements. Petitioner requested decision or certification to the