Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Michael Roy Smith v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 19-12622-CC · judgment December 18, 2020
Certiorari denied · January 10, 2022
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Erica Joan Hashimoto
Georgetown University Law Center
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Jan 10 2022Petition DENIED.
- Dec 09 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
- Dec 03 2021Reply of petitioner Michael Roy Smith filed.
- Nov 19 2021Brief of respondent Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General in opposition filed.
- Oct 01 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 19, 2021.
- Sep 30 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 20, 2021 to November 19, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
- Sep 20 2021Response Requested. (Due October 20, 2021)
- Sep 09 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Sep 01 2021Waiver of right of respondent Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General to respond filed.
- Jul 30 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 2, 2021)
- Jul 30 2021Pursuant ro Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.