Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Michael Simko v. United States Steel Corporation
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 20-1091 · judgment March 29, 2021
Before the decision, about 1.6× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Third Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).
Question presented
Whether, or under what circumstances, a claim that an employer unlawfully retaliated against an employee for filing a charge of discrimination with the EEOC under the remedial structure of Title VII may be addressed in an ensuing civil action, if the employee did not file a second formal administrative charge specifically alleging the retaliation.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John E. Egers Jr.
Julian Law Firm
For respondent
Leon F. DeJulius Jr.
Jones Day
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 10 2022Petition DENIED.
- Dec 22 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
- Dec 21 2021Reply of petitioner Michael Simko filed. (Distributed)
- Dec 08 2021Brief of respondent United States Steel Corp. in opposition filed.
- Oct 15 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 8, 2021.
- Oct 14 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 8, 2021 to December 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
- Oct 06 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 8, 2021)