Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Ashley Yoo Hyang Kim v. Huong Tran, et al.
Paid petition · Appeals Court of Massachusetts, No. 19-P-684 · judgment April 21, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
Unlike the other case's Trial Court, such as Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, Petitioner vs. Matthew Reeves, Respondent's case, the Middlesex Superior Court and the other higher Courts, could have ordered or summoned such Police or Federal agency and related laboratory locations to see what was inside of my elderly mother's renewed U.S. Passport, but in order to let me, the Pro Se Petitioner, Ashley Y.(Yoo Hyang) Kim, to prove my case, for the Middlesex Superior Court and all other higher Courts, But nothing was done about it. The questions presented are*
-
With due respect, when the very First Complaint was being dismissed, was it properly dismissed without asking the Pro Se Plaintiff, Ashley Y. Kim, then, about how she was not given any urgent and/or no alternative treatments, on May 15, 2018, by the Respondent, Dr. Huong Tran, when she opened this priority mail for her elderly mother, as she was not able to stand even with 2 different walking canes, would keep vomit, being overly nauseous, just feeling very weak and uncomfortable, but as being the main interpreter for the Pro Se Petitioner's elderly mother, at the 3rd best hospital in the U.S. and the World, she is learning that there are medications to cure these types of deadly situations... and when going to other hospitals, they are keep asking for my elderly mother's preventing cancer cells from her entire body treatments, or for any other urgent pain, she should always go to an Emergency Center, but the question remains, why didn't the Respondent, Dr. Huong Tran, did not forward the Pro Se Petitioner, Ashley Y.(Yoo Hyang) Kim, to an Emergency Center on May 15, 2018? (App. C. 7a)
-
Then, instead of providing any urgent treatments, by Dr. Huong Tran, on May 15, 2018, and even after, Dr. Huong Tran, decided to treat this incident as a mental/behavioral area, where all along, she said, she wanted to hook up the Pro Se Petitioner, Ashley Y.(Yoo Hyang) Kim, to obtain a $1,000, on a monthly basis from the Social Security and Disability Center, in order to keep fight with the Cambridge Housing Authority, just after meeting her colleague, another Respondent, Psycho-Pharmacologist, Mary Ellen Smith, but Dr. Huong Tran, the Respondent, never ever mentioned how she will label me as someone who is diagnosed with a Chronic Paranoid Schizophrenia, or has that status, with 60 pages of wrongfully created damaged mental/behavioral medical records... Ever since July 2018, the Pro Se Petitioner, Ashley Y.(Yoo Hyang) Kim, requested all Courts in the S
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Ashley Yoo Hyang Kim
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- May 23 2022Rehearing DENIED.
- May 03 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
- Dec 24 2021Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Dec 24 2021Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
- Dec 13 2021Petition DENIED.
- Nov 23 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
- Jul 10 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2021)