D. R. S. v. D. P. H. L., et al.

Should the Government, with assistance of family courts, have the sole and final say on the Frankensteining of the American Family? Does this deny basic human rights set forth in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.

At what stage of termination of parental rights, do parents actually lose their parental rights? Removal of children, trial to terminate parental rights, during search for appropriate adoptive families or a year(or set time) after adoption has commenced?

Did Florida fail in its difference in treatment, between the petitioner (and her family) and its similarly situated comparators and does it conflict with the Court’s well-established standards which are applicable to equal protection claims? The state is required to demonstrate a rational basis when it’s treating similarly situated persons differently.

When a parent retains legal rights, even if children are not in their care is their consent for adoption still valid. Can a judge revoke for other reasons than duress or fraud?

Should a government employee be granted leave to ignore criminality of another to perpetuate their end game?

Should AFSA be legal and allowable to sell children by putting a ransom on every American and foreign child’s head. Rewards are given to adopt but not keep intact. Should ASFA be found unconstitutional against basic human rights?

Should our states be allowed to monetize our most vulnerable citizens, children, and elderly, by judges and their crony lawyers and legal guardians?

Did Florida violate and discriminate in equal rights in interstate commerce.