James Conerly, et al. v. John Patrick Winn, Judge, Superior Court of California, Sacramento County, et al.

1.) Whether the Appellate Court erred by affirming the District Court’s dismissal of Plaintiffs’ action on grounds that District Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction? 2.) Whether the Appellate Court erred by rejecting Plaintiffs’ contention that the District Court was bias against Plaintiffs by treating Defendant Sharif Tarpin more favorably than Plaintiffs? 3.) Whether the Appellate Court erred by directing the Clerk to Seal the Exhibits? 4.) Whether the Appellate Court erred by failing to consider Plaintiffs’ Claim of Defendants Violating their Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional rights to Due Process? 5.) Whether the Appellate Court abused its discretion by not finding that the Family law Judges violated Plaintiffs’ Constitutional Rights To Due Process by ordering Plaintiffs to not Video Tape in public? 6.) Whether the Appellate Court abused its discretion by not considering, finding and deciding Plaintiffs’ claim that Family Law Judge John P. Winn should have Recused or been Recused from Defendants Family Law Case? 7.) Whether the Appellate Court should have considered, found, and decided upon Plaintiffs’ issue concerning the family Law Judges’ orders becoming a conflict of interest problem?