Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
William D. Brice v. California Faculty Association
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 19-56164
Before the decision, about 4.7× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Ninth Circuit decision below and a circuit split argued in the petition.
Question presented
CHE’ S. COOK, ET AL., Petitioners, v. OREGON AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES COUNCIL 75, Respondent. ———— WILLIAM HOUGH, Petitioner, v. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 521, Respondent. ———— STEVEN MASUO, ET AL., Petitioners, v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, ET AL., Respondents.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Milton L. Chappell
c/o National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc.
For respondent
Scott A. Kronland
Altshuler Berzon, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Dec 06 2021Petition DENIED.
- Nov 16 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
- Nov 15 2021Reply of petitioners William Brice, et al. filed. (Distributed)
- Nov 01 2021Brief of respondents California Faculty Association, et al. in opposition filed.
- Sep 23 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 1, 2021)