Daniel G. Szmania v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Bear Stearns Arm Trust 2007-3

, Rule 14.1(a)

1. Did THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHING­ TON error and fail in its duty when not enforcing, not recognizing and ignoring the civil court case Re­ moval to Federal Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d)? See https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1446

2. _ Did THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHING­ TON error and fail in its duty when not enforcing, not recognizing and ignoring the Lack of Personal Juris­ diction over Petitioner Daniel G. Szmania (Szmania) due to Lack of Service of Process by Wells Fargo Bank N.A., As Trustee for Bear Stearns Arm Trust 2007-3, (Wells)? Especially since the Washington State Appel­ late Court Division II, No. 50523-1-II, Ruled as such on January 3, 2019 saying on page 10: “We reversed based on Wells Fargo’s improper service ofprocess” Ap­ pendix 4. See https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/ D2%2050523-l-II%20Unpublished%20Qpinion.pdf

3. Did THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHING­ TON error and fail in its duty when not enforcing, not recognizing and ignoring the Res Judicata Doctrine that prohibits Wells from starting a new law suit against Szmania after a previous case was appealed by Szmania to THE SUPREME COURT of the UNITED STATES, No. 18-734, which the Petition was Denied Review on February 19, 2019? Appendix 2. Did THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON act within the administration of justice or was their actions an arbitrary denial of Szmania’s property; his home? See