Carol M. Kam v. John B. Peyton, Jr.

Does the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine apply to two incomplete, illegal proposed State Court Rulings pro­ duced by a former Associate Judge who failed to obtain ' a sign-off of his rulings from the Judge of Record within 30 days of their creation, as required by State Law? Per four Texas Statutes, written at the level a fifth grader can comprehend, the Court is required to have signed off on the Orders. Two of these Statutes require the sign off within 30 days. After 7 years of “fumbling”, in 2020 Texas State Court System finally and formally ruled that the un­ signed proposed Peyton Jr. Orders were never final state rulings, are not now final State rulings, and con­ firmed that they can never be made final State Orders. The Rooker Feldman Doctrine is crystal clear that it can only be applied to FINAL State Orders. In fact the 7 year burden of illegal incomplete State Orders placed on me by Peyton Jr. actually represents a viola­ tion of my Civil Rights. The sole issue for this court to consider.is “Can the Rooker Feldman Doctrine” be applied to two incom­ plete illegal proposed instruments that are not and cannot be made into FINAL State Orders.