Peter C. Benedith v. Cuyahoga County, Ohio, et al.

TO THE COURT. Question presented to the court were factual and by nature of the crime alleged, a trial was warranted to guarantee public safety. By nature of the crime, electronic harassment, the guilty will engage in this crime because it is the one way to commit murder or any crime while staying hidden. Attempted murder during a trial constitutes an attack on the whole legal System where this is supposed to be a discussion among civilized men. Attack on a prose litigant should be treated as an attack of same magnitude as attacking a lawyer who is preparing for a trial in search of restitution to the wrong done to someone. Failure to protect prose litigant during trial constitute a great disadvantage and a disservice to the legal system. The interest of the lower court should not be to defend or care about a criminal organization whose members attempted to kill and will likely try to kill again in a such a way that makes them feel invisible from the law. The right to life is absolute and the lower court failed to affirm this. Death by suicide can be considered murder in some special instances especially where an active process is involved rather than a passive process.