Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Grant Lloyd Greenwood v. Minnesota
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Minnesota, No. A20-0363 · judgment February 1, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
The question presented by this petition is whether a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of appellate counsel, and Fourteenth Amendment right to due process, are violated when:
-
A prosecutor requests a jury instruction that omits an essential element of the crime charged;
-
The prosecutor argues in summation for a conviction consistent with the omission of the essential element of the crime charged;
-
The trial court provides a jury instruction that omits the essential element of the crime charged;
-
The defendant’s trial counsel fails to object to any of the foregoing;
-
The defendant is convicted of the crime charged; and
-
The defendant’s appellate counsel on direct appeal fails to raise the issue as a basis for reversal on the defendant’s behalf.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
—
For respondent
Kelsey Rae Kelley
Anoka County Attorney's Office
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Nov 01 2021Petition DENIED.
- Oct 06 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
- Oct 04 2021Waiver of right of respondent State of Minnesota to respond filed.
- Sep 16 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 21, 2021)