Damon B. Cook v. Brian Cates, Warden

1.) WhelheR The. PehilicdeR IDamonI CqoK 4 AS AAAde. A SubS+QNlTiaL ShoWit\l9 O-F The.TeNliaL Op A CoKlSfi PuPi on)aL Ri9hT PuirSuaisiT To 2_8 (JSC 12-5302.) IN ORckR To OblaiN A See Slack v. MdDaNTig-LfZooQ) 5Z4 US.413, 483 See Kle.lSo4 V. Wol k&RCZNldd ffll) 1Z1 F3d 8Z8, 832, See MilkR-EL v. CocKtelt(2oa3) 531 U.S. 32.2. Z.) WhelheR The dfilioNleR15 3Rd Rule. (oo(b)((o) AAOilOfsJ WAS TiMeiy Filed WihhiN A ReaSoNiAble TiMe. APfeR The RhhC’TCuiT’f CASE OF: ByNoE V. BACA (HhcTZoZo) Ibb F3d 111,480 RUTuT/ZM.?n?n ? 5ee.UMikdShAksV.Holh7AAAKiaqSS)r1ln7 V.n A T20, 12.5 C^TfoV,! 3.)WheHneR The felihioNl£R,S 3RcJ Rule bo(b)(b) AAoPlOhJ PlreSeNhed EXTlAOrd i KlAlrV Ci rcuM ShAUceS WalrhaKl+iN9 RE-QPEN1isI9 The FiMAL Uud9Mei\lT As ALL(b) Phelf%’ SuPFbr+ed ___________ racPoRS R&C0NlSidelriN9o TheDiS-Hrich CouRT 2_002_ HAbeas ColrRiS 0ud9MeiTr ? See PbelPS V. AldMeidA (llhci t. 2004 ) 5b4 F 3d 1120,1134-1140 See BVNog, v. BACAiqfhcilr.ZoZo) Ibb F3d qi2^q8ofcooi<) .See T)AViS v. AAoRoNleY (llhcilr.'Zon)859 E3d 1H8, HSQ-'lSTCook) 4.) Whellr.R ThelreWfiS Xt4SuFFicie.4T Evidence Op FolCe. To ESlbblish PeliPiodeR X)AMQtsl Cook’s G-UilP BeVoNd A ReaSoNAble. DoUbT ? nn See PeoPle. v. GTiPPiM(2ool) 33 CAL. 4ih 1015,10^-24 See TAcKSQKlv.Vir9j^A MM3 as. 301, 31(a ,445X12181214II See IN RE WiivlShlP 341 US 358, 354710 S.CT 1058 ,. See Fiole v. While 531 U.S.225, 224 121 S.CT 112l2ool)