Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
United States v. Washington, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 19-35673 · judgment August 19, 2020
Before the decision, about 15.3× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a federal-government petitioner, counsel who has won certiorari before, and a Ninth Circuit decision below.
Question presented
Whether a state workers' compensation law that applies exclusively to federal contract workers who perform services at a specified federal facility is barred by principles of intergovernmental immunity, or is instead authorized by 40 U.S.C. 3172(a), which permits the application of state workers' compensation laws to federal facilities "in the same way and to the same extent as if the premises were under the exclusive jurisdiction of the State."
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
For respondent
Noah Guzzo Purcell
Office of the Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Amicus briefs
1 merits
(1 supporting pet./neither)
Argument & decision
Argued April 18, 2022 — Malcolm L. Stewart · Tera M. Heintz. Audio and transcript
Decided June 21, 2022. Opinion by Breyer.
Proceedings
- Jul 25 2022JUDGMENT ISSUED
- Jun 21 2022Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
- Apr 18 2022Argued. For petitioner: Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Tera M. Heintz, Deputy Solicitor General, Olympia, Wash.
- Apr 13 2022Response in opposition to sur-reply in support of suggestion of mootness filed by petitioner United States. (Distributed)
- Apr 11 2022Sur-reply in support of suggestion of mootness filed by respondents Washington, et al. (Distributed)
- Apr 08 2022Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)
- Mar 25 2022Brief of respondents Washington, et al. filed. (Distributed)
- Mar 23 2022CIRCULATED
- Mar 23 2022Brief amicus curiae of Workers' Injury Law & Advocacy Group filed. (Distributed)
- Mar 23 2022Reply on suggestion of mootness filed by respondents Washington, et al. (Distributed)
- Mar 17 2022Response in opposition to respondents suggestion of mootness filed by petitioner United States. (Distributed)
- Mar 17 2022The record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and available on PACER.
- Mar 16 2022Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.
- Mar 15 2022ARGUMENT SET FOR Monday, April 18, 2022.
- Mar 15 2022Suggestion of mootness filed by respondents Washington, et al. filed. (Distributed)
- Feb 23 2022Brief of petitioner United States filed.
- Feb 23 2022Joint appendix filed. (Statement of cost filed)
- Jan 10 2022Petition GRANTED.
- Dec 01 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
- Dec 01 2021Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)
- Nov 15 2021Brief of respondents Washington, et al. in opposition filed.
- Sep 22 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 15, 2021.
- Sep 21 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 14, 2021 to November 15, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
- Sep 08 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 14, 2021)